Comparison Tool

Brookfield Asset Management vs Macquarie Asset Management

Side-by-side comparison of fund managers. Analyze AUM, strategy, health scores, team size, and track record.

MetricBrookfield Asset ManagementMacquarie Asset Management
AUM$900B$2B
Primary StrategyReal EstateReal Estate
HeadquartersCanadaUK
Founded1899N/A
Employees1,200N/A
Investment ProfessionalsN/AN/A
Ownershippublicindependent
Outside StakeYesNo
Stakeability Score67%57%
Team Stability71%41%
Growth Score85%75%
Funds Tracked524
Avg Fund IRR10.7%N/A
Websitehttps://www.brookfield.comhttps://www.macquarie.com/asset-management

Which GP is better for your portfolio?

The right GP depends on your investment objectives, risk tolerance, and portfolio construction needs. Consider strategy fit, track record consistency, team stability, and alignment of interests when evaluating managers. GP Stakes provides comprehensive data to support your due diligence process.

For Capital Preservation

Look for higher team stability scores, longer track records, and established institutional relationships.

For Growth Exposure

Prioritize growth scores, recent fund vintage performance, and hiring activity signals.

For GP Stakes Investment

Focus on stakeability scores, ownership structure, AUM growth trajectory, and fee revenue stability.

Need Deeper Analysis?

Get access to detailed health scores, fund-level performance, and proprietary stakeability metrics.

Get Full Access